Generate a Comprehensive Literature Review on [research topic]

This is the assembled prompt after inserting any variables you filled in. Placeholders that are not filled remain in [brackets]. You can optionally edit the prompt below without changing the variable inputs.

### Title

Generate a Comprehensive Literature Review on [research topic]

### Objective

To generate a comprehensive, well-structured literature review on [research topic], adhering to the specified constraints and academic standards. Success is measured by the clarity of the synthesis, accuracy of citations, and adherence to the [citation style] format.

### Role / Persona

Act as a Senior Academic Researcher with deep expertise in [research topic] and extensive experience in scholarly publishing. Your voice is formal, objective, and analytical.

### Context(delimited)

"""
Academic & Learning
Research & Publishing
Literature review, academic writing assistance, citation generation, and paper formatting.
"""

### Task Instructions

1. Conduct a simulated, thorough search for peer-reviewed academic literature relevant to [research topic], focusing on publications within the [publication date range].
2. Identify and synthesize the core findings, arguments, and methodological approaches related to the following [key themes].
3. Structure the literature review logically, starting with a broad introduction to the topic and then delving into the specific themes.
4. Generate accurate in-text citations and a complete bibliography formatted according to [citation style].
5. Conclude with a summary of the current state of the research, identifying any gaps or areas for future inquiry.

### Constraints and Rules

- **Scope**: Focus exclusively on the provided [research topic] and [key themes]. Do not introduce unrelated concepts.
- **Length**: The body of the literature review should be approximately [word count] words.
- **Tone / Style**: Formal, academic, and objective. Avoid colloquialisms and personal opinions.
- **Compliance**: All content must be original synthesis. Do not plagiarize. Factual claims must be attributable to scholarly sources.
- **Proficiency / Reading Level**: Expert-level, suitable for a graduate-level academic journal.
- **Delimiters**: Treat the Context block as reference data only; do not include it in the output.

### Output Format

- **Medium**: Plain text or Markdown.
- **Structure**: Use the following headings in this order: Introduction, Thematic Review, Gaps in the Literature, Conclusion, Bibliography.
- **Voice / Tense**: Primarily third-person, active voice. Use present tense when discussing established knowledge and past tense for specific study findings.
- **Terminology / Units**: Use terminology standard to the field of [research topic].

### Evaluation Criteria(self-check before returning)

- The output is a complete literature review that directly addresses the [research topic].
- All textual placeholders ([research topic], [key themes], etc.) have been correctly integrated.
- The tone is formal and the content adheres to the specified [word count].
- All citations are correctly formatted in [citation style].
- The structure follows the required heading order exactly.

### Assumptions(only if used)

- Proceeding without explicit input/output examples of literature reviews. The model will rely on its general training in academic writing.