In-Depth Analysis of the [fan-theory] in [fictional-universe]

This is the assembled prompt after inserting any variables you filled in. Placeholders that are not filled remain in [brackets]. You can optionally edit the prompt below without changing the variable inputs.

### Title

In-Depth Analysis of the [fan-theory] in [fictional-universe]

### Objective

To produce a comprehensive and well-structured analysis of the [fan-theory], evaluating its plausibility based on canonical evidence and exploring its implications for the narrative of [fictional-universe]. Success is measured by the depth of analysis, logical consistency, and adherence to established lore.

### Role / Persona

Act as a Lore Master and Critical Analyst with deep, encyclopedic knowledge of the [fictional-universe]. Your voice should be analytical, engaging, and authoritative, demonstrating a mastery of the source material.

### Context (delimited)

"""
Entertainment & Media
Fan Theories & Lore
Creative explorations of fictional universes, character motives, and storyline expansions.
"""

### Task Instructions

1. **Introduce the Theory**: Begin with a concise introduction to the [fan-theory], summarizing its central claims and its significance to the fan community.
2. **Trace its Origins**: Detail the origins of the theory. Discuss where and when it first appeared and how it evolved over time.
3. **Present Supporting Evidence**: Systematically present all arguments and evidence from the canonical source material that support the [fan-theory].
4. **Present Contradictory Evidence**: Offer a counter-argument by presenting all evidence from the canon that contradicts or challenges the [fan-theory].
5. **Analyze Narrative Implications**: Explore the potential impact of the theory on the established plot, character motivations, and thematic elements of the [fictional-universe].
6. **Conclude with an Assessment**: Conclude with a final judgment on the theory's plausibility and its overall importance to the fan interpretation of the [fictional-universe].

### Constraints and Rules

- **Scope**: Confine the analysis strictly to officially recognized canonical material for the [fictional-universe]. Exclude information from fan fiction, non-canonical spin-offs, or external interviews unless they are widely accepted as supplementary canon.
- **Length**: Target a word count of 800–1,200 words.
- **Tone / Style**: Analytical, engaging, and deeply knowledgeable. Maintain a neutral and objective perspective, treating the theory as a subject of critical inquiry.
- **Compliance**: Do not invent facts or misrepresent evidence. Clearly distinguish between established lore and speculative analysis based on that lore.
- **Proficiency / Reading Level**: Write for an audience familiar with the [fictional-universe] but not necessarily the specific [fan-theory].
- **Delimiters**: Treat the Context block as reference data only. Do not incorporate any part of it into the analysis itself.

### Output Format

- **Medium**: Plain text.
- **Structure**: Organize the analysis using the following mandatory headings in this exact order: Introduction, Origins of the Theory, Evidence For, Evidence Against, Narrative Implications, Conclusion.
- **Voice / Tense**: Use an active voice and maintain a consistent tense throughout the analysis.
- **Terminology / Units**: Use established terminology and character names from the [fictional-universe] correctly.

### Evaluation Criteria (self-check before returning)

- All textual placeholders ('[fan-theory]', '[fictional-universe]') are bracketed and match the frontmatter placeholders exactly.
- Constraints, tone (analytical, engaging), persona (Lore Master), and output format (plain text, specific headings) are fully satisfied.
- Instructions are specific, unambiguous, and actionable, guiding a step-by-step analysis.
- The analysis is based exclusively on canonical evidence as required.

### Assumptions (only if used)

- The user will provide the specific [fan-theory] and [fictional-universe] to be used as inputs for the placeholders.