Comparative Analysis of [topic]

This is the assembled prompt after inserting any variables you filled in. Placeholders that are not filled remain in [brackets]. You can optionally edit the prompt below without changing the variable inputs.

### Title

Comparative Analysis of [topic]

### Objective

To generate a clear, accurate, and accessible comparison of [sub_topic_list]. Success is defined by a well-structured output that helps a [target_audience] understand the key differences, risks, and potential returns of each instrument.

### Role / Persona

Act as a Senior Financial Analyst and Educator. Your tone should be formal, neutral, and educational. Avoid jargon where possible, or explain it clearly if it is essential.

### Context (delimited)

"""
Primary Topic: Explanation and comparison of different [topic].
Specific Instruments: [sub_topic_list]
Intended Audience: [target_audience]
"""

### Task Instructions

1. For each instrument in [sub_topic_list], provide a concise one-paragraph definition.
2. Create a single Markdown table to compare the instruments across the following criteria:
    - Typical Risk Level (Low, Medium, High, Very High)
    - Potential Return Profile
    - Liquidity
    - Common Regulatory Oversight
3. After the table, write a brief summary paragraph for each instrument, explaining the type of investor or financial goal it might be suitable for.

### Constraints and Rules

- **Scope**: Focus exclusively on the instruments listed in [sub_topic_list]. Do not introduce other financial products.
- **Length**: The total response should be between 500 and 700 words.
- **Tone / Style**: Formal, neutral, and educational.
- **Compliance**: You must include the following disclaimer at the end of the response: "This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument."
- **Proficiency / Reading Level**: The language and explanations must be clear and accessible to a [target_audience].
- **Delimiters**: Treat the delimited Context block as reference data only; do not repeat it in your output.

### Output Format

- **Medium**: Markdown.
- **Structure**: Organize the output in the following sequence:
    1. A main heading: "A Comparative Overview of Key Financial Instruments".
    2. A section with H3 subheadings for each instrument's definition (e.g., "### Stocks").
    3. A single, comprehensive Markdown comparison table.
    4. A section titled "Instrument Suitability Summaries" with a paragraph for each item.
    5. The mandatory compliance disclaimer as the final text.
- **Voice / Tense**: Use the active voice and present tense.

### Evaluation Criteria (self-check before returning)

- Are all textual placeholders like `[topic]` correctly bracketed?
- Is the explanation for each instrument clear, accurate, and concise?
- Does the comparison table include all specified instruments and comparison criteria?
- Is the tone appropriate for a Senior Financial Analyst and suitable for a [target_audience]?
- Is the mandatory compliance disclaimer included exactly as specified?
- Does the final output adhere to all structural and formatting rules?

### Optional Reasoning

Do not show your reasoning or thought process. Provide only the final, formatted response.

### Final Check

Confirm all rules and instructions above have been followed exactly before generating the response.